35mm
f/1.8 MD W.Rokkor-X |
||||
![]() |
||||
The
35mm f/1.8 was one of the lenses fully redesigned with the move to the
MD series of lenses.. |
||||
With
an angle of view of 63 degrees, the 35mm lens is an exceptionally versatile
lens. The lens is perfect for expansive landscape photos while still being
suitable for group portraits and family photos. Many fixed lens rangefinders
throughout the 1960s and 1970s had lenses of between 35mm and 40mm for
this very reason.
Despite still being constructed of 8 elements in 6 groups, the MD lens was a completely different design to the MC lens it replaced. The MC was a very large lens, and quite heavy (approximately 410 grams)while the new MD lens is significantly more compact and weighed a mere 240 grams. Other changes included the switch to a 49mm filter thread, and the introduction of a plastic aperture ring. This lens forshadowed the conversion of many lenses from 55mm filter threads to 49mm threads with the introduction of the MD third generation ('plain MD') series. As a result, if most of your lenses are the later models, you will find that this matches your existing kit, while if you are (like me) a fan of the earlier MD Rokkor-X and late MC series lenses, then this filter thread will be an odd one in your bag. Personally, I simply keep a 49-55mm step up ring on this lens at all times, and use a 55mm cap, and so my lens is always ready for a 55mm filter. There has been much discussion on various Minolta groups as to which of the two lenses (MC and MD) is the sharper, and opinions are mixed, but with some leaning towards the MD model. Whichever is the sharpest, it is certainly a very close call, and both exhibit excellent resolution, contrast and lack of distortion. Unlike the 24mm f/2.8 and 28mm f/2, the 35mm does not have the floating element design for improved close -focus, however this means that it has a non-rotating front element, which is a handy feature in a lens used for landscape photography. I have conducted some basic testing of this lens to evaluate its performance, which is detailed below. The scans have been conducted by my lab at approximately 2200 dpi, and the crops are at 100%, after moderate use of the unsharp mask (150%, radius 0.3, threshhold 3). |
||||
![]() |
||||
The
original scene - apologies for the uninspiring photograph. |
Performance
at f/1.8 |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Centre |
Corner |
|||
Considering
that the above shots were taken wide open at f/1.8, the results are very
creditable, if not astonishing. Centre sharpness is exceptional, and while
the corner has suffered to a degree from flare, the resolution is excellent.
Note the detail inside the window. At f/4 the 24-50mm zoom resolved none
of this detail. |
Performance
at f/2.8 |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Centre |
Corner |
|||
At
f/4 the centre and corner resolution improves, we can see individual bricks
in the corner photo, and there is more contrast in the crop from the centre
of the image. |
Performance
at f/4 |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Centre |
Corner |
|||
At
f/4 sharpness and contrast in both crops is improved. The flare that was
evident in the corner crops has been eliminated, and we are starting to
see good detail in the brickwork. |
Performance
at f/8 |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Centre |
Corner |
|||
At
f/8
the image appears very sharp, and shows excellent contrast. |
Summary |
||||
In
summary, the 35mm f/1.8 appears to be an exceptionally sharp lens, and
it is even sharp wide open, albeit prone to flare at that aperture. Contrast
is outstanding, and based upon a ebay price range of approximately US$170
- $190, the lens is affordable and a great asset. Minolta also manufactured
a 35mm f/2.8 which is much cheaper than this lens (approximately US$50
- $70) which probably perfoms similarly at f/4 and above. |
![]() |
||
35mm
f/1.8 MD W.Rokkor-X |
||
Cokin
Graduated Blue 2 and Sunset 1 filters |
||